Search for: "Com. v. Key (Complete Opinion)"
Results 21 - 40
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
I completely whiffed here. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:09 am
” While Crawford and Davis were decided unanimously, Giles v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:32 am
There’s some stuff in the opinion about problems the parties had in completing the necessary discovery, but this is about as expansive a reading of the remedial nature of Rule 60, and of abuse of discretion, as you’re likely to find. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
CREED-21 v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Dissenting opinion by Mihara, J.) [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:20 am
In State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
Solano County Airport Land Use Com. (2007) 41 Cal.4th 372, 381, emph. added.) [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
The FTC brief cites Lens.com dozens of times, and the 10th Circuit Lens.com opinion remains one of the most important cases against the initial interest confusion doctrine. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 9:49 am
Here is a more complete summary. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:36 am
A couple of months back, I wrote a post about State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 2:54 pm
The Court of Appeal’s Opinion Key takeaways of the published opinion include: CEQA is interpreted to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language, and “[t]he EIR is the heart of CEQA” with its purpose of giving the public and government the detailed information about environmental consequences, potential mitigation, and alternatives needed to make informed decisions. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
This summary addresses key issues in the published portion of the decision in the order as presented in the opinion: A. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:11 pm
The en banc high court partially reversed a Court of Chancery decision that the derivative suit must be dismissed because IAC met the requirements of independence set by the milestone opinion in Kahn v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
A complete analysis of this opinion related California’s win in a partial summary judgment over California-Quebec&rs [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:27 am
I have not seen published decisions on key words v Boolean v concept search; I think you are right that these issues come up but don’t generate written opinions. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 11:30 am
See Dep't of Com. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
(E.g., Saltonstall v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
Com. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
