Search for: "Com. v. Page" Results 21 - 40 of 462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
This is because, upon seeing the signs, the Court assumes that“many consumers will refer to the mark … by the word ‘france’ alone, as the abbreviation ‘.com’ will be perceived as referring to a website” (citing judgment of 13 December 2007, Xentral v OHIM — Pages jaunes (PAGESJAUNES.COM), T‑134/06, EU:T:2007:387, paragraphs 56 and 61). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  Additional evidence of that is provided by Irby v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  The attorney in another case had filed a 19-page memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and the rules limit those to 15 pages, so the last four are stricken. [read post]
The court also held that the Chinese company was not entitled to the benefit of the ACPA’s safe harbor provision because it could not have reasonably believed that its registration of PRU.COM was lawful (The Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:38 pm by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
Origem dos acessos A maior parte dos acessos dos vídeos postados no canal, 34% (241.281 exibições), foi feita no chamado “YouTube channel page player”, ou seja, no próprio site. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:37 pm by Bill Araiza
From the Religion Clause blog (via my co-author Tom Baker) coms news of Nieto v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:15 am by christopher
(Thanks as always to LLRX via @bsookman in Toronto) Romano v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:31 am by Russ Bensing
  You can also access the actual opinion through the web page. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:53 am by christopher
How ironic that Gore’s Bush v Gore attorney, David Boies, represents another Prince in borrowed armor. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
  Last week in Skinner v. [read post]