Search for: "Com. v. Smith, T."
Results 21 - 40
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2009, 3:32 pm
Smith’s general holding that the Free Exercise Clause isn’t violated by religion-neutral laws of general applicability. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:08 am
This isn’t necessarily the end of the road for Smith and Allen. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:43 am
Com. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH | CJEU on disclosure of infringers’ bank data in Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg | Infocit - Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda v OHIM | Moral ambiguity of trade secrets | CJEU on limits of TM exclusive right in TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd |… [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am
Smith are unlikely; there, the 8th District vacated a plea because the trial court hadn’t told the defendant he had the right to subpoena witnesses, even though he had used the exact words of the rule: “you have the right to compulsory process. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
” Nonetheless, just last year a bitterly divided Court, in a 5-4 vote in Connick v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:33 am
And last week in Harris v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:40 am
Smith involve similar situations. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH | CJEU on disclosure of infringers’ bank data in Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg | Infocit - Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda v OHIM | Moral ambiguity of trade secrets | CJEU on limits of TM exclusive right in TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd |… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:45 am
The clear holding of Smith is that if you were sentenced before the statute was amended after Ice, then Foster still controls; the flip side of that is that if you were sentenced after the amendment, then Foster doesn't. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:17 am
”Oh, don’t take it personally, Tameka. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 2:29 am
Last week’s 8th District decision in State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am
You don’t need to await the opinions of the courts of appeals; they’re right here… In State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:58 am
Good news for Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:35 am
(Although Smith was given concurrent sentences, the opinion even includes a discussion of State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
The facts in State v. [read post]
