Search for: "Com. v. Strong"
Results 21 - 40
of 204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm
In Rales v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
The second question was subject to the CJEU referral in the Nokia v Daimler (see previous posts here), but which has so far remained unanswered in Europe. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 8:45 am
See Anderson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
Whistleblowers are generally speaking truth to the powerful and without strong legal support, the powerful will always squash the powerless. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 5:58 am
(Google LLC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 11:56 am
Her animus against causation and Rule 702, however, was so strong that her chapter in the third edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, which came out almost one year after her death, she embraced the First Circuit’s notorious anti-Daubert decision in Milward, which also post-dated her passing.[2] Despite this posthumous writing and publication by Professor Berger, there have been no further instances of Zombie scholarship or ghost authorship. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:37 am
In the recent case of Owen v Galgey & Ors.,[2] the English High Court was faced with the issue of applying Article 4 of Rome II to a personal injury case. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:32 am
Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Com. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 2:48 pm
(USPTO v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
Ds will have strong argument if they’re using other designs, words, or logos. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
In Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:28 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:38 pm
” Samaritan’s Purse v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:57 am
Shadi.com v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Amchem v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:02 am
County of Los Angeles and Estrada v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Canada (Attorney General) in 1993, and Sauvé v. [read post]
