Search for: "Comm. v. Small (Majority Opinion)"
Results 21 - 40
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Buoyed by her earlier success producing relatively small events, Wilson became determined to produce a concert on a much larger scale. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
Comm. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
The revenue thresholds may be designed around companies like Google and Facebook, but Maryland businesses—including many small businesses—are the ones actually paying. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
Class – The employer does not offer a major medical plan to the same “class” of employees who are eligible for the ICHRA reimbursement. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
Comm’n, 499 U.S. 144 (1991). [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
Township of Scott, concluding that a plaintiff alleging that local governments have violated the Takings Clause under the Fifth Amendment may seek relief directly in federal court, as a constitutional violation occurs at the time of the taking without payment, even if just compensation is subsequently paid.[1] In the 5-4 majority opinion, the Court overruled, in part, Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
However, in a brief concurring opinion in Mahoney v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
type=live&comm=uscc&filename=uscc012518 (link is external)Thursday, January 25, 2018Location: Dirksen 419Hearing Co-Chairs: Commissioner Dennis Shea and Commissioner Katherine Tobin, PhD9:45 AM – 9:50 AM: Opening Remarks: Commissioner Dennis Shea and Commissioner Katherine Tobin, PhD9:50 AM – 11:20 PM: Panel I: Mercantilism with Chinese Characteristics: Creating… [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
" But the majority opinion affirms summary judgment based on a "hot dispute"—the applicable statute of limitations, which is a legal question to be decided by the court.And the majority opinion incorrectly holds that, as matter of law, FDCPA claims must fail when "only a small portion of the debt [sought to be collected] may have been time-barred. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:17 pm
The majority wisely explained: “The better analogy to this case is Board of Airport Comm’rs of Los Angeles v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 5:28 pm
In Friday’s Lexington Fayette Urban County Human Rights Comm’n v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
Comm’r of Revenue (U.S. 1983) (special tax on newspaper ink violates First Amendment). [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm
Andy Deutsch, Internet Comms Coalition: transmit and host content; interest in tech changes and cooperative efforts to develop best practices for 512. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:04 am
Cohen v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
OPINION OF THE SUPREME COURT GRANTING IMMUNITY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ NO. 14-0536 ════════════ JESUS RUBEN MOLINA, PETITIONER, v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
Socialist Workers ’74 Campaign Comm. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The Court’s Myopia The plurality opinion in McCutcheon, like the majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
