Search for: "Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilson" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, Lukaszewski v The District Court in Torun, Pomiechowski v District Court of Legunica 59-220, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Rozanski v Regional Court 3 Penal Department, and NJDB v JEG and anor. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand-down is Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, and Lady Arden. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 8:14 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
While the tax system created under the Revenue Act of 1862 faded away, it did have at least one lasting impact: the establishment of the office of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 3:45 am by Scott Bomboy
That tax expired in 1872, but the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and its successor have remained in business since. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Blog  Editorial
   International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch [2013] EWCA Civ 39 – granted on 29 July 2013 by Lord Mance, Lord Wilson and Lord Reed. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am by INFORRM
  In the late 1990s he was convicted of conspiracy falsely to account, having transferred monies to offshore companies to cheat the revenue. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
When introducing the Supreme Court Bill in December 2002, the Attorney-General, the Hon Margaret Wilson, said that the new Supreme Court was expected to hear about five times the annual number of cases heard by the Privy Council. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 22 B.T.A. 1407, 1931 WL 473 (U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:48 am
Michael Wilson (PDF 205 KB)Letter Expresses Concern that Provisions in the Recently Passed Energy Bill (H.R. 6) May Prevent Use of Oil From Canadian Oil Sands by the U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media and Communication blog has an article exploring how the courts are handling sexual misconduct defamation hearings six years on from the start of the #MeToo movement. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:22 am
David Wu and Vernon Ehlers (PDF 3.00 MB) Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellites: Restructuring Is Under Way, but Technical Challenges and Risks Remain 06/07/2007 GAO Report to Internal Revenue Service Acting Commissioner Kevin Brown (PDF 1.32 MB) Internal Revenue Service: Status of GAO Financial Audit and Related Financial Management Report Recommendations 06/07/2007 Growth and Responsibility in the World Economy (PDF 177… [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
On the same day there is an application concerning mode of trial in the case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police before Tugendhat J. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Court of Appeals Paternity - Defense of Equitable Estoppel - Applied to Deny Non-Biological Father Right to Deny Paternity In Commissioner of Social Services on Behalf of Elizabeth S. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:50 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
If the name rings a bell, you’re right: Dan Alban of the IJ successfully took on the Internal Revenue Service – and won – in the fight against regulating tax preparers in Loving et al v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
The challenged provisions amended the Internal Revenue Code by adding: (1) a "penalty" payable to the Secretary of the Treasury by an individual taxpayer who failed to maintain adequate health insurance coverage and (2) an "assessable payment" payable to the Secretary of the Treasury by a "large employer" if at least on of its employees received a tax credit or government subsidy to offset payments for certain health-related expenses. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
DLA Piper has a summary here, and Bret Wilson here. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson media law blog has examined Leveson 2 and Section 40 libel costs in wake of the announcement of the consultation on Leveson. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]