Search for: "Commissioner v. Tower"
Results 21 - 40
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2022, 4:23 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 09/03/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/03/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors,… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 23/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 14/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
On Tuesday 8th February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of DCM (Optical Holdings) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland). [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:18 am
On Tower UK Ltd (formerly known as Arqiva Services Ltd) v AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd, on appeal from [2020] UKUT 0195 (LC). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
Cell site simulators (aka “stingrays”) pose as legitimate mobile towers, tricking phones within its range to connect to it. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Judgement was handed down by Nicklin J in Riley v Murray [2021] EWHC 3437 (QB) on 20 December 2021. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Jumping off the Ivory Tower Podcast 3. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
In his first weeks in office, President Biden issued several executive actions focused on reevaluating and unwinding the panoply of protectionist immigration policies former President Trump set in place through executive branch action. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:12 am
Grace Ranch, LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:12 am
Grace Ranch, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
PHOTOS: President Trump's Mount Rushmore speech"We gather tonight to herald the most important day in the history of nations: July 4th, 1776 [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
... [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:05 am
Unpacking Stock Splits – Stock Split v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
” Proposed FEC Rule Would Further Constrain Foreign Election Contributions National Public Radio – Philip Ewing | Published: 8/1/2019 The FEC proposed new rules to outlaw exchanges like the one that took place when a Russian delegation visited Trump Tower in 2016 to offer Donald Trump’s campaign “dirt” on Democrats. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:56 am
In Miami-Dade County v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm
The article considers how provisions introduced in the Data Protection Act 2018 may empower the Information Commissioner to better tackle data misuse. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
United States and Wiener v. [read post]
