Search for: "Commoner v. Du Pont" Results 21 - 40 of 181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2018, 3:49 am
The mark has achieved a "marginal degree of fame," and therefore the 5th du Pont factor was deemed neutral. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:05 am
"Therefore, the second du Pont factor weighed in favor of Applicant.As to the marks, the Board found them dissimilar in connotation and overall commercial impression. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Oakville Hills Cellar, Inc., dba Dalla Valle Vineyards v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:13 am
Finding that the first and second du Pont factors weigh in opposer's favor, the Board sustained the opposition. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:37 am
"Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found confusion likely and it sustained Carl's Section 2(d) claim. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:43 am
”Similarity of Marks – As is common when the opposer is relying on different marks and registrations for its opposition, the Board focused only on the mark it found “most pertinent” for its du Pont analysis, i.e., the JUSTICE CENTRAL mark. [read post]