Search for: "Commonwealth v. Andrews, R." Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am by Ralf Michaels
Senior judges have repeatedly noted the excesses of the Spiliada regime, in terms of the time, expense and judicial resource spent in litigating questions about the appropriate forum (see, most recently, Lord Briggs in Vedanta Resources Plc v Lungowe [2019] UKSC 20, [6]-[14]), yet they and the rule makers have done little or nothing about it. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Andrew’s in Syracuse, NY; Diocese of Central New York, et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
R (on the application of Calver) v Public Services Ombudsman for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Censure of Councillor for controversial comments about council meeting on his blog breached his art.10 ECHR free expression rights. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Sept. 9, Dowling, J.).Whether other trial court judges from around the commonwealth will rule in a similar fashion or will, instead, apply the same rule of discovery pertaining to video surveillance remains to be seen.Claims of Privileged Information in DiscoveryIn its decision in the case Brown v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 6:22 am by Jani
As explained by Tania Voon and Andrew Mitchell: "...the law applies equally to all tobacco products from all countries, including Australia and New Zealand. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by admin
Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 127 S.Ct. 1727, 1742 (2007) (emphasis added; internal citations omitted). [8] See Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am by John Elwood
There, the commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Philadelphia district attorney challenged the grant of habeas relief to a woman convicted of murdering her disabled stepson. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am by Colin Murray
  Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am by Colin Murray
  Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]