Search for: "Commonwealth v. Grant, G." Results 21 - 40 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While inquiries into the Australian class actions market and the potential regulation of litigation funders are not new[v], the Federal Government in the past two months has sharply turned its attention on litigation funders by taking two significant steps: Litigation funding inquiry: On 13 May 2020, the Commonwealth Attorney-General announced an inquiry into litigation funding and the regulation of the class action industry. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
A Probate and Family Court judge ordered the father to vacate the marital home and issued temporary orders granting the mother sole custody of the child, and a date for a hearing was set. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
In hearing the question of leave together with the appeal, then granting leave, the two key issues for determination by the Court of Appeal were: Whether a claim for unliquidated damages could fall within the scope of the arbitration clause which required claims to be concerning monetary amounts ‘under this agreement’ (the construction issue); and Whether Hannigan had waived his entitlement to arbitrate by bringing the proceedings in 2017 (the waiver issue). [read post]
There are certainly some judges in the Commonwealth who are hostile to non-compete agreements and would take the latter approach, so careful drafting will be necessary if S.1117 becomes law. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:33 am by Naomi Shatz
Today, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) hears oral argument in Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
.: Brookings Institution Senior Fellow Michael O’Hanlon will engage Rebecca Grant, president of IRIS Independence Research, and Tom Ehrhard, vice president at the Long Term Strategy Group, in a conversation on Air Force modernization and budget priorities. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]