Search for: "Commonwealth v. House, J."
Results 21 - 40
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2014, 5:36 am
On December 15, 2011, after verifying that `Marvin Rideout’ was, in fact, the suspect detected by Anders, Detective J. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:39 pm
Supp. 2d 83, 92 (D.D.C. 2008); Commonwealth v.Fenstermaker, 530 A.2d 414, 417-19 (Pa. 1987); see also In re Search Warrant for Secretarial Area Outside Office of Gunn, 855 F.2d 569, 575-76 (8th Cir. 1988) (Bowman, J., concurring). [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:42 pm
In the recent Massachusetts case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 6:42 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 6:42 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:42 pm
In the recent Massachusetts case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 7:11 pm
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts issued it opinion on December 9, 2008 unanimously upholding the lower court's order in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
[FN1] IRELAND, J. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 10:34 pm
In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 4) [2011] FCA 761 Optus was ordered to pay to the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty of $5.26 million for misleading advertisements (Optus 1 was previously discussed here). [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 7:47 pm
(For a good summary of the case law, see Equity Access Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corp (1989) 16 IPR 431 at 440-441 per Hill J.) [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
SCOTT, J., joins. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
The Superior Court in Mangel relied on its own 2011 decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
Pennsylvania et al. and Donald J. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 8:53 am
Supp. 2d 83, 92 (D.D.C. 2008); Commonwealth v.Fenstermaker, 530 A.2d 414, 417-19 (Pa. 1987); see also In re Search Warrant for Secretarial Area Outside Office of Gunn, 855 F.2d 569, 575-76 (8th Cir. 1988) (Bowman, J., concurring). [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am
However, Bailey - and specifically Justice Scalia's concurrence - calls the SJC's ruling in Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
While taking this step, Binnie J. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 4:32 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 10:30 pm
House of Representatives v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:19 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
