Search for: "Commonwealth v. Lord"
Results 21 - 40
of 214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Lord Phillips queries whether, on the facts, there is sufficient control. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:12 am
Lord Kerr and Lady Hale, dissenting on the issue of improper motive, considered that the Court of Appeal should have recognised that there was a substantial possibility that the Administrative Court would have taken a different view of the evidence heard in cross-examination if they had admitted the cable and the case had proceeded to its conventional conclusion. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
Lord Carnwath considered that “there is a measure of support for the use of proportionality as a test in relation to interference with ‘fundamental’ rights”. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale, with Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed unanimously agreeing with her findings. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 2:09 pm
In Mathis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:39 am
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another (Appellants) v Yunus Rahmatullah (Respondent) The Supreme Court has ruled that the law of habeas corpus should not be used to order the US to return a Pakistani national held in US custody to the UK. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and anor v Yunus Rahmatullah, heard 2 – 3 July 2012. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:40 am
Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWCA Civ 1540 - read judgment A Pakistani detainee was sufficiently in the control of the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and the Secretary of State for Defence to support the issue of a writ of habeas corpus, and it should not be withheld on any grounds concerned with diplomatic relations. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm
The ‘ingredients’ of such a claim are set out in a developing body of case law: The public body’s statement “must be clear, unambiguous and devoid of relevant qualification” (R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2009] AC 453 at paragraph 60). [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
‘The Right to Shoot Himself’: Secession in the British Commonwealth of NationsDonal K. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
GOGGINS AND OTHERS v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:36 am
Indeed, anyone reading the full account of the evidence and facts given in Lord Neuberger’s judgment may well form their own view as to the underlying rights and wrongs of the British actions in 1948. [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:26 am
” -- Holt C.J., Slater v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Commonwealth (Ky. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
Martin v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 2:13 am
Lord Kerr gave the dissenting judgment, with which Lord Reed agreed: they would both have allowed the appeal. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
R (Bancoult No 3) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 28-29 Jun 2017. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
Lord Carlile and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department – read judgment The High Court has upheld an order by the Home Secretary preventing Maryam Rajavi, a prominent Iranian dissident, from speaking in Parliament. [read post]
