Search for: "Commonwealth v. PHILLIPS" Results 21 - 40 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2008, 9:38 am
  If you're interested in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
  At issue in Simmons v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:37 am by Charles O'Mahony
  See also the decision in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v United States Department of Health and Human Services where in July a Federal Judge in Massachusetts ruled that legislation prohibiting the recognition of same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58:  The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:37 pm by Amy Howe
It pointed to Angel v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am by Laura Sandwell
Starting on Wednesday 23 November 2011 is the two day hearing of Sugar (Deceased) (Represented by Fiona Paveley) v BBC, which on appeal from the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) and will be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance and Dyson. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
  This uncertainty is the result of an ever-growing split of authority not only between the Pennsylvania state and federal courts, but also among, and even within, the different federal district courts across the Commonwealth. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
Today’s live blog team comprises Lucy Hayes (Olswang), Anna Phillips (Nabarro), James Gliddon (CMS), Tom Sandeman (Nabarro), Emma Boffey (CMS) and Iona Millership (Olswang). 16.00 The Lord Advocate has now concluded his submissions for today. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
 The law was a total compromise, needing the agreement of every state and territory and the Commonwealth. [read post]