Search for: "Commonwealth v. Powell, S." Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Oct. 26, 2016), the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court followed it prior decision in the case of Stermel v WCAB, 103 A.3d 876 (Pa. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 11:00 pm by INFORRM
Judge Jarrett also reached a similar conclusion in relation to Powells words as he did about Wood’s words about whether the conduct was undertaken because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of Prior or the group she identified and whether they constituted a “mere slight”, as opposed to having profound or serious effects. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am by Stephen Page
Under s 48 a final order may contain the conditions or prohibitions the Magistrates Court considers necessary or desirable. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:23 pm by Steve
App. 250, 257, 532 S.E.2d 908, 912 (2000), quoted in Powell v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:25 am by Jeff Gamso
------------------*There's an actual standard for that, set out by Justice Powell in his concurring opinion in Ford v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:22 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/825688.no1.pdf State v. [read post]