Search for: "Commonwealth v. Price, D."
Results 21 - 40
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Some have never sought recognition because their university has not offered it; others have chosen to give up the various benefits of recognition as the price of avoiding heavy-handed university regulation. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:46 am
He is, for example, a recognized leader in the response to Alice Corp v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 4:53 am
In short, the price tag for Florida businesses to comply with HB 969 is staggering and could result in bankrupting smaller enterprises. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 8:04 am
Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) and Reps. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
Vega, d/b/a Professional Interpreters of Erie v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am
Sunstein, One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Harvard, 2001) Larry D. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm
While inquiries into the Australian class actions market and the potential regulation of litigation funders are not new[v], the Federal Government in the past two months has sharply turned its attention on litigation funders by taking two significant steps: Litigation funding inquiry: On 13 May 2020, the Commonwealth Attorney-General announced an inquiry into litigation funding and the regulation of the class action industry. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” Gunn v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” Gunn v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:27 am
LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1760(d), 1759(a)(1)) who, if not for the closure of the school attended by the child during a public health emergency designation and due to concerns about a COVID-19 outbreak, would receive free or reduced price school meals under the Richard B. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1760(d), 1759(a)(1)) who, if not for the closure of the school attended by the child during a public health emergency designation and due to concerns about a COVID–19 outbreak, would receive free or reduced price school meals under the Richard B. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
There are certainly some judges in the Commonwealth who are hostile to non-compete agreements and would take the latter approach, so careful drafting will be necessary if S.1117 becomes law. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
This Client Advisory, originally distributed in December 2019, highlights important developments in the law governing employee benefit plans and executive compensation over the past year. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
P. 38.1(d). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am
Broad exceptions also result in value gaps[14] where creators cannot negotiate market prices and are not adequately compensated, or compensated at all.[15] You have heard that exceptions are needed to promote “innovation”. [read post]
