Search for: "Commonwealth v. Samuel S"
Results 21 - 40
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm
Heytens is solicitor general and Martine Cicconi is deputy solicitor general of the Commonwealth of Virginia, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of 15 states and the District of Columbia in support of the respondent in Trump v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
Commonwealth, the Ohio Supreme Court’s ruling in Rutherford, and the New York Constitutional Convention of 1821. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:57 am
At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Samuel Bray runs down the amicus briefs and related articles discussing “the scope of the injunction” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:27 am
People, 1 Doug. 207 (Mich. 1843),” “Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
This guidance closely tracks IRS Notice 2018-88 and provides that an ICHRA offers “affordable” coverage if the difference between the amount of the reimbursement available through the ICHRA and the cost of self-only coverage for the lowest cost silver plan available to the employee on the ACA Exchange (in other words, an employee’s out-of-pocket cost for coverage on the ACA Exchange after reimbursement from the ICHRA, if the employee purchases the lowest cost silver plan)… [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 pm
This part of the chapter has taken on increased salience in light of the Supreme Court's recent cert grant in Liu v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 5:54 am
Michelle Anderson, Professor of Law, Stanford Law School Juliet Moringiello, Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development and Professor of Law, Widener University, Commonwealth Law School John Pottow, John Philip Dawson Collegiate Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School David Skeel, S. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Ghana’s Constitutional history from 1840 to 1960Nikki Kalbing, U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts’ dissent, joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Stephen Breyer, is the most straightforward, in that it relied principally on PG&E v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
Research and Resources The Divergent Paths of Commonwealth Privacy Torts, Supreme Court Law Review, vol. 84(2d), pp. 225-267, , 2018), Samuel Beswick and William Fotherby, Harvard University, Law School and Independent Rethinking Liability Rules for Online Hosting Platforms, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn – Universität Mannheim, Discussion Paper Series – CRC TR 224 (2019), Miriam C. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:55 am
Hardiman’s opinion in Drake v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
(It is perhaps telling that Citizens United is cited seven times in Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion for the court in Janus.) [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection Brett Wilson’s media law blog has considered the recent case of Sabados v Facebook Ireland which involved a request for the disclosure of information pertaining to the deletion of a deceased person’s account. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:02 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:23 am
It was cited as to "liberty of the press" in Chancellor Kent's 1827 Commentaries on American Law and in Joseph Story's 1833 Commentaries on the Constitution, as to venue in libel cases in Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
During yesterday’s oral argument in Currier v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
This week’s decision by Justice Samuel Alito (who entertains emergency motions from within Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania) to leave undisturbed the congressional districting ruling last month by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court—in League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v Commonwealth (League of Women Voters)—is a helpful reminder of the importance of state courts and state constitutions in safeguarding American democracy. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:12 am
The Fourth Amendment was also the focus of the second hour, when the justices heard oral argument in Collins v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:38 pm
Just last Friday, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
In Yeager v. [read post]
