Search for: "Commonwealth v. Stephens, S."
Results 21 - 40
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2021, 5:27 am
" The Court also found the Commonwealth's record of prior disruptive conduct purportedly justifying the buffer zones to be woefully deficient, as was the Commonwealth's record of having tried, without success, other means of addressing the problems that threatened its interests. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Another version of the decision, Rex v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University -- Cover's Impact on Jewish Studies Stephen Wizner, William O. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
(It is noted that Attorney Stephen T. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
Judge Stephen A. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 807 A.2d 906, 914 (2002).The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:46 am
He is, for example, a recognized leader in the response to Alice Corp v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am
The minority (Lord Stephens and Lord Briggs) would have dismissed Libya’s appeal on the first issue. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm
Over-vigorous application of a statutory offence might be greeted in similar terms to those employed by the Lord Chief Justice in the Twitter Joke Trial case (Chambers v DPP), an appeal from conviction under s.127 of the Communications Act 2003: “The 2003 Act did not create some newly minted interference with the first of President Roosevelt’s essential freedoms – freedom of speech and expression. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am
Over-vigorous application of a statutory offence might be greeted in similar terms to those employed by the Lord Chief Justice in the Twitter Joke Trial case (Chambers v DPP), an appeal from conviction under s.127 of the Communications Act 2003:“The 2003 Act did not create some newly minted interference with the first of President Roosevelt's essential freedoms – freedom of speech and expression. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:23 am
Lancaster County District Attorney’s Office v Walker– local reporter Carter Walker submitted FOIA requests to try to discover what Lancaster Penn’s District Attorney does with forfeited property and how proceeds were spent. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
In Rush, Judge Stephen G. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
I promised quite a while ago to say more about Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
Commonwealth prosecutors have declined to charge the ABC journalist Dan Oakes over his reporting of alleged war crimes by Australian special forces in Afghanistan. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 12:12 am
The case is Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi A.S. v 000 Insurance Company Chubb, [2020] UKSC 38. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 11:50 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued opinions in which Judge Stephen Reinhardt participated and, in at least one case (Altera Corp. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
In 1975, Ginsburg argued at the Supreme Court on behalf of Stephen Wiesenfeld, who wanted to obtain Social Security benefits that would allow him to stay home with his young son after his wife, a schoolteacher, died in childbirth. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:33 pm
In today's decision in County of Butler v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm
On Aug. 14, a 2-1 panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled California's confiscation unconstitutional, in Duncan v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:13 pm
In Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
