Search for: "Commonwealth v. Strong, J." Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm by Charon QC
Obiter J also considers: Citizen’s Arrest – a limited power @TheCustodySgt  asks: “Think Mark Bridger deserves the death penalty? [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm by Charon QC
Obiter J also considers: Citizen’s Arrest – a limited power @TheCustodySgt  asks: “Think Mark Bridger deserves the death penalty? [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:00 am by INFORRM
On the other hand, both the High Court of Australia (Australian Capital Television v Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106, [1992] HCA 45 (30 September 1992)) and the European Court of Human Rights (Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v Switzerland (No 1) 24699/94, (2002) 34 EHRR 159, [2001] ECHR 412 (28 June 2001); TV Vest As & Rogaland Pensjonistparti v Norway 21132/05, (2009) 48 EHRR 51, [2008] ECHR 1687 (11 December 2008); Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz… [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am by Michael Douglas
Stewart J held there would be strong reasons for not enforcing the exclusive foreign jurisdiction clause even if it were incorporated and enforceable: Karpik v Carnival plc (The Ruby Princess) (Stay Application) [2021] FCA 1082; (2021) 157 ACSR 1, [331]. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm by Michael Douglas
The new FCR r 10.42(j) provides: (j)  if the proceeding arises under a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory, and: (i)  any act or omission to which the proceeding relates was done or occurred in Australia; or (ii)  any loss or damage to which the proceeding relates was sustained in Australia; or (iii)  the law applies expressly or by implication to an act or omission that was done or occurred outside Australia in the circumstances alleged; or… [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:01 am
See Moreno, 413 U.S. at 541 (Douglas, J., concurring). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:13 am by Darren O'Donovan
This is significant, when we compare this judgment with the attitude of the English Court of Appeal in the 1994 case of R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte Rees-Mogg. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
Rares J dissented, upholding the primary judge’s refusal of a stay (FCAFC, [96]). [read post]