Search for: "Communities v. State Water Resources Control Bd."
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Pix Credit HEREThe legal and academic community spent the better part of 4 years under the Trump administration refining the jurisprudence of administrative law and regulation. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
San Francisco Bay Reg’l Water Quality Control Bd. (2020) 59 Cal.App.5th 199. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
San Francisco Bay Reg’l Water Quality Control Bd. (2020) 59 Cal.App.5th 199. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm
State Water Resources Control Bd. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 873, 880; and Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
From a helicopter, you can take in the water and the security barrier in one glance. [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
State Water Resources Control Bd. (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1392, 1421.) [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:18 pm
The RWQCB established a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for fecal coliform in the creeks, imposed discharge prohibitions approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and USEPA, and required owners/operators (including animal/livestock owners, though not specifically the Fairground) to control discharges and monitor and report progress. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:28 pm
Water Works and Sewer Bd. of City of Birmingham, 239 F.3d 1199, 1204 (11th Cir. 2001) (noting that the employer may not “choose whether an employee’s FMLA-qualifying absence” is protected or unprotected by the FMLA). [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
From Pinnacle Bancorp, Inc. v. [read post]