Search for: "Comstock v. Comstock" Results 21 - 40 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2023, 10:34 am by Josh Blackman
Maybe five of the Justices thought that the Comstock Act claims were unmeritorious. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The Pellegrini defendants have met their prima facie burden demonstrating that they did not depart from the requisite standard of care (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 49-50 [2015] citing Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347 [2012]). [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:45 am by Tracy Thomas
Reva Siegel & Mary Ziegler, Our Victorian Supreme Court, Slate The fate of mifepristone, a drug used in more than half of abortions in the United States, will now be decided by the same conservative justices who reversed Roe v.... [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Notably, the key decisions pre-date Roe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
" For a refresher on Comstock and the Comstock laws, check out this 2019 episode of the Dig podcast. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) opined that the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) could still mail medications used for abortion because DOJ interpreted the Comstock Act to apply to “unlawful use. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:38 am by Charles Sartain
Delay in filing suit too often spells doom for the plaintiff, as we learn in Zadeck Succession et al v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm by Jennifer Dalven
Access to abortion has been decimated in the United States since June when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:06 pm by Reference Staff
One of the most famous censorship cases to land in the courts is United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 12:15 am
   The Hale and Norcross mine was a famous silver and gold mine in Nevada's Comstock mining district. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am by Josh Blackman
Comstock (2010): "The Court is correct, in my view, to hold that the challenged portions of 18 U.S.C. [read post]