Search for: "Concepcion v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 459
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Beth Graham
The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to consider whether asking a party to an arbitration agreement to demonstrate prejudice when claiming a waiver defense violates the requirement established 10 years ago in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-1410, and Kahn v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 1:58 pm by Ellena Erskine
United States and is set to interpret another provision later this term in Concepcion v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 7:16 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Concepcion v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 12:17 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States considers constitutional limits to military courts’ jurisdiction over retired servicemembers. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 8:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
: Password-sharing is a “ubiquitous, useful, and generally harmless” activity that “millions of people” engage in, United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:48 pm by Greg Mersol
(Oct. 11, Dec. 30 and Jan. 16) Much of that saga currently focuses on the case of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:04 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
In 1995, she joined the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida as an Assistant United States Attorney litigating civil cases. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:47 pm by John Lewis and Joseph S. Persoff
Recent decisions by both the California and United States Supreme Courts have found that state policies which unduly impede arbitration are invalid. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:47 pm by John Lewis and Joseph S. Persoff
Recent decisions by both the California and United States Supreme Courts have found that state policies which unduly impede arbitration are invalid. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:37 pm by Brian Murphy and Myles Moran*
As we mentioned in our blog upon this law’s enactment, the United States Supreme Court has routinely held that state laws expressly identifying a category of non-arbitrable state law claims are preempted by the FAA. [read post]