Search for: "Concerned Citizens Committee v. Board of Supervisors" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am by Anushka Limaye
.: CSIS will host a conversation with Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am by Anushka Limaye
Represents the Board on special boards, panels, and committees, as directed. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Anushka Limaye
Represents the Board on special boards, panels, and committees, as directed. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am by Anushka Limaye
Represents the Board on special boards, panels, and committees, as directed. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 11:19 pm by William W. Abbott
Superior Court (1988) 45 Cal.3d 491, in which the California Supreme Court concluded that implementation of special legislation concerning transportation facility funding in Orange was reserved exclusively to city councils and board of supervisors, not the voters. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am by MBettman
The National Nurses Organization Committee filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) alleging Affinity engaged in unfair labor practices in terminating Wayt. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
The plaintiffs had challenged the state’s denial of a “Choose Life” license plate after two pro-choice Missouri senators registered their opposition and the committee charged with issuing the plates rejected the plaintiffs’ request for reconsideration of the denial. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The court also rejected the argument that the MOU offered by the applicant to the Board of Supervisors constituted mitigation, finding that there was insufficient basis to conclude that the Board of Supervisors relied upon the MOU as any form of impact mitigation. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court reasons:Because Williams spoke before the Nassau County Legislature not “as a citizen on a matter of public concern,” Garcetti v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
  The court held it was proper to apply this deferential standard even to the City Board of Supervisors’ interpretation of General Plan policies it did not adopt itself, but which were instead enacted by a citizen-sponsored initiative; it reasoned that “the Board’s role in implementing the General Plan, including its discretion to determine whether proposed projects are consistent with the General Plan, is at least as important [as whether… [read post]