Search for: "Concerned Nurses v. Higher Educ."
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm
Education attorney Lori Fox’s essay analyzes the Court’s decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:22 am
Pix Credit HERE It is only appropriate that, as China's leading societal forces celebrate the 100th anniversary of its organization as the Communist Party of China, that this vanguard consider carefully its own progress and the way it meets its responsibilities as the leading force charged with the guidance of the Chinese nation toward the establishment of a communist society. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Scenario: promo materials say that one drug in a clinical study had a numerically higher overall response rate than another drug, but it’s not clinically significant: touting the numerically higher response rate would be misleading. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:53 am
H. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
From Gruber v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
The suit, Texas Democratic Party et al v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Institutions played a relatively limited role in this theory and we were supposed to educate workers. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
The patient may also be exposed to higher levels of radiation due to the need to perform more x-rays. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:07 am
However, there is concern that the law is insufficient. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:56 am
” [1] Gay v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
http://j.st/5vG Cash v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
The Special Committee Report described the then context saying: Increasingly in recent years, the Law Society of Upper Canada became concerned about a number of problems related to legal education. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:34 pm
”[22] This will results in higher state deficits and lower reimbursement rates. [read post]
