Search for: "Conde v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
Véase El Condominio: El Régimen de Propiedad Horizontal en Puerto Rico (2nda Ed. 2019). [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:15 am by Eleonora Rosati
These sorts of alterations have exploded in the USA, to the point that states like California and Virginia have introduced deep fake-specific legislation.The discussion was then followed by Kelsey Farish’s take on contractual issues arising between a talent and brand when negotiating the rights to use an image. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am by INFORRM
On those aspects which reach the Court, there will be uniformity in the Member States. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, James Conde explains “two ways in which the Supreme Court could avoid the constitutional concerns posed by the Fourth Circuit’s decision” in PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, James Conde weighs in on PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5745, Conde v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:42 am by Emma Broches, Julia Solomon-Strauss
As Nora Ellingsen explained in October 2016, at the time of Ludke’s arrest, he was traveling to Mexico as part of his plan to join the Islamic State when he was apprehended by law enforcement along with a co-conspirator, Yosvany Padilla-Conde (whose case is still ongoing). [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:42 am by John Delaney
Though that studio’s films are usually based on stories that have run in its glossy magazines, in this case Condé Nast “skipped” publishing a Naruto v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]