Search for: "Condon v. People" Results 21 - 40 of 419
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2023, 3:21 am by SHG
Tim Cushing does an excellent job of saying what needed to be said about the Third Circuit’s decision in Fenico v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 1:10 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Condoning reckless falsehoods or deliberate lies has serious consequences. [read post]
7 May 2023, 5:55 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Two recent decisions of  CAAF condone unlawful or bad practices when OSI, CID, NCIS, and CGIS search cellphones; United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Michael Dreeben
Why, they asked, should unelected Justices be empowered to strike down laws passed by the democratically elected Knesset, which represents the will of the people? [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
They alleged that from 2015 until 2020, the company’s directors ignored red flags about a corporate culture that condoned sexual harassment and misconduct. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 2:13 pm by Alejandro Moreno and Eugene Choi
In doing so, the Court allowed stockholder derivative plaintiffs to proceed with oversight claims against the company’s former Global Chief People Officer, who allegedly presided over a corporate culture that condoned sexual harassment. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Without condoning any particular leak, I would say the doctrine gets the balance about right, as applied to the Court no less than to the Pentagon or the people whose conversation was unlawfully intercepted and recorded in Bartnicki. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:30 am by SHG
Can an artist be compelled to create a website for an event she does not condone? [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
In Nguyen v Neuls, 2021 SKQB 202, Ms. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 8:30 am by Russell Knight
People are allowed to transfer property they own in Illinois. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, said the court, "[I]t is the responsibility of the administrative agency to weigh the evidence and choose from among competing inferences therefrom and, so long as the inference drawn and the ultimate determination made are supported by substantial evidence, it is not for the court to substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency," citing Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152… [read post]