Search for: "Conservation Law Foundation v. Public Utilities Commission"
Results 21 - 40
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
Several nonprofit environmental groups filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (“Energy Commission”). [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Where there is genuine disagreement about whether a project is in the public interest, the law does not require that the interests of Indigenous peoples prevail. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Lake Norconian Club Foundation v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Lake Norconian Club Foundation v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:45 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2019)This post is the third of a series of three posts in which the CPE WGE examine the question of paths to empire performed through the choices being made by the U.S. and Chinese leadership cores [领导核心] within the theater of the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 4:20 am
” At The National Law Review, Lawrence Weinstein and Jeffrey Warshafsky look at PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
He also joined the conservative wing in campaign finance cases dealing with private contributions and public finance, in Second Amendment cases, in criminal law and criminal procedure cases, and in cases protecting conservative speech, like the 2000 case upholding the Boy Scouts’ right to exclude gays; the case last month involving the Colorado baker who didn’t want to create a same-sex wedding cake; and the case a few weeks ago of the Illinois state… [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:36 am
Some legal practitioners adopted a conservative attitude trying to fit the tokens of their clients within the tests provided by the 1946 SEC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Foundations: SOE CSR and Human Rights Compliance B. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Writing for the Brookings Institution, Lisa V. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
The only statutory authority OPR cites to support its action is a non-CEQA statute (the Warren-Alquist State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Act, at Pub. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
In that case, a Quebec statute provided that patients could not obtain private health insurance for medical services available within the public health care system. [read post]
