Search for: "Consolidated Machine Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit sua sponte consolidated the appeals en banc and affirmed by a one-vote margin, with no opinion garnering a majority of the judges on the Second Amendment issue. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
Circuit, Case No. 11-1428, consolidated with 11-1441, 12-1427 & 13-1076. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Below is a consolidation of the five-part series in full. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
For some reason, we recently found ourselves comparing our favorite defenses to our favorite rock bands. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:28 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
The underlying multi-district consolidated action pending in Ohio’s Northern District alleges that Whirlpool’s “front-loading washing machines (the Duets) allow mold and mildew to grow in the machines, leading to ruined laundry and malodorous homes. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 10:11 pm by Jon Gelman
Lautenberg enlisted in the military at the age of 18 and served in the Army Signal Corps in Europe during World War II. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:22 am by John L. Welch
Welcome Industrial Corp., Opposition No. 91180838 [Opposition to UNIVERSAL HOME FASHIONS for furniture and home furnishings, on the ground of likely confusion with the registered mark UNIVERSAL "furniture," and on the ground on non-use as to some of Applicant's goods].May 17, 2012 - 2 PM: Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Adam Thierer
In fact it’s gone so far that it’s in the process of consolidation with probably two players dominating everything, Nokia Corp. and Motorola Inc. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm
Osako sold its products in the United States through Consolidated International Corp., its exclusive distributor, which was a company independent of Osako. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
Benguet Consolidated Mining Co., 342 U.S. 437 (1952), as the proper general jurisdiction analysis that the North Carolina court should have employed. [read post]