Search for: "Constant v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2016, 3:47 pm
’ R.K. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 12:02 pm
United States Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 10:01 pm
In the Putt-Putt v. 416 Constant Friendship decision, the court granted summary judgement in favor of Putt-Putt’s federal and Maryland State trademark infringement and unfair competition claims. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:20 am
The following contribution to our Shelby County v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 6:21 am
The Third Department gives a nice analysis of the law of "account stated" in its decision, Antokol & Coffin v Myers ;2011 NY Slip Op 06051 ;Decided on July 28, 2011 ;Appellate Division, Third Department . [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:21 pm
Upset by the state constitutional amendment, a group took the issue to federal court to challenge the constitutionality of Proposition 8 and won on August 4, 2010 (See Perry v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:54 am
Regina (St Helens Borough Council) v Manchester Primary Care Trust and Another Court of Appeal “The decision whether the care needs of a woman who required constant and expensive care should be met by the health service or by social services was one for the primary care trust acting on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 11:00 pm
In Timbs v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:34 am
R (St Helens Borough Council) v Manchester Primary Care Trust and another [2008] EWCA Civ 931; [2008] WLR (D) 288 “It was for the primary care trust acting on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health and not for the local authority to decide whether the care needs of a woman with dissociative identity disorder were primarily for health care or for care which a social services authority should provide. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 12:18 pm
His eyebrows were in constant motion, he frequently nodded, and his natural expression was that of a smile. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 4:43 am
It also stated, as it had already held in the cases Pretty v UK and Haas v Switzerland, that the right to private life under article 8 ECHR does not entail an obligation for states to assist citizens seeking to commit suicide.FactsThe applicant was the widower of a woman who had been almost completely paralysed and in need of constant care since 2002. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am
Supreme Court announced its decision today in McDonald v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 6:26 am
Beall v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:20 pm
While cases of voluntary adoptions designed to thwart the requirements of ICWA require constant vigilance from states and tribes, the law provides broader protections for those families in the state child welfare system. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:35 am
In Brown v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 11:00 am
To be fair, Angie's study came from residents of a state that has outlawed payday lending, so there still might be a lower-than-low rating for these lenders. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 7:12 am
Additional Resources: Rish v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 4:06 pm
While this has not been utilized by agents of the state to the best of our knowledge, it would seem that such a use of technology by police officials would ultimately fall under the same rules, at least as long as users intend data to remain private. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
As the heart of Washington comes back to life this morning, the Watch remains your constant companion in these tumultuous times. [read post]
