Search for: "Constantine v. Constantine" Results 21 - 40 of 191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am by Dan Lopez
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PODCAST Episode Transcript and Show Notes: Jeff Shinder: Welcome to Antitrust Matters, a Constantine Cannon podcast where we have engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 1:35 am by Nedim Malovic
Furthermore, the intervener, before the Cancellation Division, did also not refer to the lack of distinctive character of the contested mark or the corresponding provision, but claimed solely that the contested mark was deceptive and had been registered in bad faith.It is settled case law that pleas must be interpreted in terms of their substance rather than of their classification (Torrefazione Caffè Michele Battista v EUIPO (T-221/18) EU:T:2019:382). [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am by Dan Lopez
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PODCAST Episode Transcript and Show Notes: Jeff Shinder: Welcome to Antitrust Matters, a Constantine Cannon podcast, where we have engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 7:18 am by Zak Gowen
  If you have any questions about single-brand markets, do not hesitate to contact Constantine Cannon today. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm
*Poppy Alexander and Chris McLamb are attorneys in the whistleblower practice of Constantine Cannon LLP. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm by llaird
*Poppy Alexander and Chris McLamb are attorneys in the whistleblower practice of Constantine Cannon LLP. [read post]