Search for: "Contracting & Material Co. v. City of Chicago"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am
Contrast that to the Court’s more recent decision in MGM v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Derdeen v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Leiter also notes that, during the 1930s, the University of Chicago hired, as one of its new faculty members, a PhD in Philosophy even though he lacked a degree in law. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Columbia Sportswear successful in reducing counterfeits in China (IP Dragon) Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court orders New Apple Concept Technology to pay Apple 400,000 Yuan in damages for trade mark infringement and unfair competition (DeBund) 2386 IPR cases dealt with by Culture Administrations in Q3 (DeBund) Well-known trade marks can be recognised on basis of the products’ sales volumes (DeBund) Judicial Criteria for copyright cases (part 2) (DeBund) Beer and… [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
The following facts, among others, can be relevant: whether the worker determines or can meaningfully negotiate the charge or pay for the work provided; whether the worker accepts or declines jobs or chooses the order and/or time in which the jobs are performed; whether the worker engages in marketing, advertising, or other efforts to expand their business or secure more work; and whether the worker makes decisions to hire others, purchase materials and equipment, and/or rent space. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 1:21 pm
/Pacor Material Supply Co. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
(Peter Thomas Lane, Schlanger & Schlanger LLP, Pleasantville, N.Y.; Owen Randolph Bragg, Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Chicago, IL, on the brief), for Saliha Madden.Thomas Arthur Leghorn (Joseph L. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
(Peter Thomas Lane, Schlanger & Schlanger LLP, Pleasantville, N.Y.; Owen Randolph Bragg, Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Chicago, IL, on the brief), for Saliha Madden.Thomas Arthur Leghorn (Joseph L. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm
City of Ontario v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
City of Chicago (08-974) Argued: Feb. 22, 2010 Issue: Whether, where an employer adopts an employment practice that discriminates against African Americans in violation of Title VII’s disparate impact provision, a plaintiff must file an EEOC charge within 300 days after the announcement of the practice, or whether the plaintiff may file a charge within 300 days after the employer’s use of the discriminatory practice. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Chicago Dynamic Industries, 201 U.S.P.Q. 25 (N.D. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
Johnnie's Poultry Co., 344 F.2d 617 (8th Cir. 1965), violation. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:25 am
The case is In re Summit Business Media Holding Co., 11- 10231, U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:19 am
v=lzatElTvT6U. [read post]
