Search for: "Cook v. Employment Division" Results 21 - 40 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2013, 1:40 pm by Bexis
Wright, et al (June 7, 2013)(unpublished) and Blake v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court, in Zehl v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:11 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  But, if the employer does not take a tip credit (that is, if the employer does not pay less than the federal minimum wage to tipped employees), employers and employees can agree to include non-tipped employees like dishwashers and cooks in the tip pool. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:16 am
About five years ago, skycaps at Logan International Airport sued American Airlines in DiFiore v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:00 pm by cwo@barkerolmsted.com
Employers should not simply assume that supervisors can share in the division of tip jars. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:46 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Final Rule also quantifies the minimum amount of potable water the employer must provide (4.5 gallons per day for drinking and cooking purposes). [read post]
Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division recently issued opinion letters addressing (i) the 8-and-80 overtime pay system available to certain healthcare employers; (ii) the overtime exemption for teachers, and (iii) the exemption for employees in agriculture. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:26 am
I. v New York City Bd. of Educ., 256 AD2d 189; McDonald v Cook, 252 AD2d 302; and Lemp v Lewis, 226 AD2d 907, in support of its ruling. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
[“(T)he fact that there can be no Constitutional impairment of pension system benefits does not create a constitutional right to stay in public employment” (see Cook v City of Binghamton, 48 NY2D 323); “(An) expectation of remaining in public employment ... is not within the scope of protection afforded by the Nonimpairment Clause. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 11:39 am by Keith Goodwin and Greg Labate
On the one hand, a 2009 decision by the California Court of Appeal in Etheridge v. [read post]