Search for: "Cook v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2021, 5:40 am
Johnson Opinion appears to be dicta and should only be considered to be more in the form of an advisory opinion by the Superior Court on the scope and reach of the Fair Share Act given that one judge on the Superior Court panel sat out of the decision. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 12:01 pm
Dart, October 23, 2021, Kendall, V.). [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 12:01 pm
Dart, October 23, 2021, Kendall, V.). [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
Last summer, in Espinoza v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:31 pm
Donnelly, a May 17,2021 non precedential decision by the Superior Court. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:31 pm
Donnelly, a May 17,2021 non precedential decision by the Superior Court. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 6:04 pm
Justice Myers of the Superior Court of Justice heard a consent motion to transfer a case under Rule 13.1.02 (2) in Polgampalage v Devani. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
In Matter of Cook v Sierra, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 115878 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
In Matter of Cook v Sierra, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 115878 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm
The court’s ruling essentially invalidates SWRCB’s nearly two-decade-long effort to fill the gap left by the shrinking scope of regulation under the federal Clean Water Act following the Supreme Court’s 2001 decision in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
In the case of McMichael v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Lockett v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
While experts have noted that these provisions do not expressly address elections for federal office, an Arizona superior court judge ruled in the 2016 case Brakey v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm
More recently, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released a decision in Barker v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 4:36 am
In a preliminary settlement filed in San Mateo Superior Court, the social network agreed to pay damages to American moderators and provide more counseling to them while they work. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Greenhill v. [read post]
