Search for: "Coombs v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 12:26 pm by Phil Cave
Coombs notes on his website that on 12 January 2012, they filed a deposition request. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Model Rules of Professional Conduct: rules may vary by states. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 2:05 am by Adam Wagner
Obiter J points out: R v Smurthwaite and Gill 1994 involved “Solicitation to Murder. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:15 am
The Appellate Division sustained her termination without a hearing, finding that Ramos had violated the terms of her disciplinary probation (Ramos v Coombs, App Div, 237 AD2d 713).NYPPL [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:36 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  It’s called,  United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am by @ErikJHeels
Syndicate, The (West Springfield, MA) B&V Cab, Inc. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am by Dave
Thanks to the virtual telegraph, I’ve had the transcript in R (Coombes) v Secretary of State for CLG and Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 (Admin) for a few days (but it still does not appear on Baili, although, I gather, is available on Westlaw and the like), but a variety of circumstances (man flu/an excellent conference/family holiday culminating in a dramatic late night trip to a&e with my eldest, who’s absolutely fine, thanks) have prevented me from… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am by Dave
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am by Dave
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm by Stephen Page
These matterswere previously dealt with exclusively bystate courts under state law however thenew Part VIIIAB puts these mattersunder the jurisdiction of the Family Court and theFederal MagistratesCourt.2.34 These amendments did not apply to termination agreements. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:15 am
The ruling found a physician liable for failing to warn his patient about the side effects of the medications and the potential danger of driving while taking them.The Boston Globe reports on the case and a copy of the slip opinion in the decision of Lyn-Ann Coombes, administratix v. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
Family Voices members are paid staff within the Title V agency, providing information and support on health concerns to families around the state. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 10:55 pm
The Court likely soon will consider a petition to review a challenge to a state law authorizing execution as punishment for a nonfatal sexual assault on a child, Kennedy v. [read post]