Search for: "Cooper v. Mart Associates" Results 21 - 34 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2011, 7:01 am by Conor McEvily
  Yesterday Paul Karlsgodt reviewed last Term’s decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Opponents contended that religious groups should be able to govern their lives according to their conscience within the parameters of law if the constitutional right to freedom of religion and association is to have any real value. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:38 am by Nabiha Syed
Pete Yost of the Associated Press reports on one case that the Justices considered at their conference yesterday, involving the liability of defense contractors that cooperate with soldiers in war zones. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We wouldn’t get involved in the science, ex post v. ex ante and that sort of thing. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Associates First Capital Corp., 2001 WL 35948712, at *23 (D. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’ – motion… [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360)   Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango)   Denmark Court denies injunction… [read post]