Search for: "Cordes v. USA" Results 21 - 27 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
Egg World LLC et al (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) TTAB precedential no. 36: TTAB refuses to find fraudulent intent where applicant relied on advice of counsel: MCI Foods v Brady Bunte (TTABlog) Fame of LE CORDON BLEU brings TTAB 2(d) victory over CORD ON BLUE for Cord Storage Units (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability: Are the marks FIRESIDE GLOW and FIRESIDE WARMTH confusingly similar for air fresheners? [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:51 am by John L. Welch
Muffman Products, LLC, Opposition No. 91155779 [Opposition to registration of CORD ON BLUE for "General purpose non-metal storage units for use in hanging cards, namely, stretch cords, electrical cords and bungie cords" on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with and dilution of the registered mark CORDON BLEU and variations thereof for culinary educational services and printed materials pertaining to cuisine].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 48314 Olympia, WA 98504-8314 Phone: (360) 586-3558; (800) 634-4473 (V/TTY/Toll Free) Web: www.wa.gov/ddc Helping Hands for the Disabled P.O. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
Phone: (404) 881-0292 Fax: (404) 881-6997 E-mail: gaaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgga ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Southeast Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access Georgia Tech, 490 10th Street Atlanta, GA 30318 Phone: (404) 385-0636; (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: sedbtac@catea.org Web: http://www.sedbtac.org Georgia ADA Exchange 4164 Admiral Drive Chamblee, GA 30341… [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:46 am
Though not presently named as defendants, the DOJ alleges that "[v]arious others" (presumably various NAR member-boards) have conspired with the NAR in the violations alleged in the complaint. [read post]