Search for: "Correction Officer J. May" Results 21 - 40 of 2,307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The Board thus made it clear this act of the Office had had no legal effect. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
If a request for re-establishment is based on an isolated mistake the appellant must plausibly show that there was a normally satisfactory system established at the relevant time in the office in question (Case Law, 6th edition 2010, VI.E.7.3.3 a), J 13/07 [5.1]). [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:24 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Please bring to our attention any inaccuracies that may be included so they may be corrected, or information removed as requested. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the event the individual challenges the medical finding and submits evidence from his or her treating physician to support a claim of "continued total disability," however, the termination of benefits payable under General Municipal Law § 207-c and an order to report for duty may not be enforced until an administrative hearing has been heldIn this instance the correction officer sought such an administrative hearing. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the event the individual challenges the medical finding and submits evidence from his or her treating physician to support a claim of "continued total disability," however, the termination of benefits payable under General Municipal Law § 207-c and an order to report for duty may not be enforced until an administrative hearing has been heldIn this instance the correction officer sought such an administrative hearing. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 3:05 pm by Kevin
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2432731/O-J-Simpson-caught-stealing-COOKIES-prison-cafeteria.html Thanks for your time— Kevin Underhillwww.loweringthebar.net FROM: Public Information Officer           Nevada Dept. of Corrections TO:     Kevin Underhill RE:      Re: Simpson Mr. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:40 am by Jessica Kroeze
The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and asked "to receive a new, corrected invitation for filing a request for restoration of the right of priority including a new time limit". [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
J 4/97, J 12/03, J 25/03, J 14/04, J 7/06, J 8/06). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:31 am by admin
Conclusion Our office often assists F-1/J-1 holders whose SEVIS records have incorrect information and are attempting to obtain a certain F-1/J-1 benefit and most often the issue can be resolved either by the DSO directly or by requesting a data fix. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
These drawings were to take the place of the sheets with Figures 1 to 10 filed before.[6] It has been decided by the Legal Board of Appeal that while it is not expressly stipulated in R 56 that an applicant may file on his own motion missing parts of the description or missing drawings, an applicant may nevertheless do so (decision J 27/10 [4]). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Under the principles laid down in the decisions T 14/89 and J 13/90, there is a legitimate expectation on the part of the applicant that the EPO should draw to the applicant’s attention deficiencies in a request for re-establishment of rights which are obviously easy to correct. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 2:48 pm by RCoffield@fsblaw.com
Depending on the circumstances, the minimum necessary PHI may include, for example, an individual’s name and the result of the screening.For more information on HIPAA and COVID-19, see OCR's February 2020 Bulletin, Office for Civil Rights, U.S. [read post]