Search for: "Correctional Officer Anderson"
Results 21 - 40
of 505
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Anderson. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
Anderson.] [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
Anderson to press. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Anderson, the Section Three case pending before the Supreme Court, it is important that there has been a full five-day trial of the facts in the Colorado courts. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
Anderson. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:42 pm
Close Modal Suggest a Correction Suggest a Correction The post Warner Bros. movie crews return to downtown Sacramento to film scenes of DiCaprio project appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Therefore, even if Chief Justice Chase had held in Griffin’s Case, as Trump asserts, that “congressional enforcement legislation [is] the exclusive means for enforcing section 3” (Chase didn’t do so), and even if that proposition were correct (it’s not) or if Chase were right about what he did hold about the inability of courts to enforce Section 3 against someone already in office (he wasn’t), that still would not… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
And interpreters must resist the temptation to assume that their own views are so obviously correct that all opposing views are in this category – thinking, I am so surely right, that if I were wrong, somebody would have said so! [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Ohio apply to the Section 3 question, and that such incitement was a form of “engaging in” the violent insurrection itself—conduct that disqualifies Trump from serving in any future covered federal or state office, including the presidency. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
Anderson” is based on a serious mistake. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Anderson have pivoted to a new strategy. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am
We simply sought to arrive at a correct understanding of Section Three as a matter of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
” If the presidency isn’t an office of the United States, of what sovereignty is it an office? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:30 am
Anderson case. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
Even if a particular Justice concludes that most of Trump’s (and the Colorado Republican Party’s) many arguments are unavailing, Trump only needs to convince that Justice that one of those arguments is correct in order to preclude that Justice from voting to affirm. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Anderson—contend that Trump is disqualified to serve as President. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Anderson, the Section 3 case. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
If that is correct and Mr. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
But this self-serving relationship between activist short-sellers and entrepreneurial plaintiff officers of the court is conflict-ridden and hinders the fact finder’s impartiality when a short report forms the basis for lead plaintiffs’ alleged violations of the federal securities laws under Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
Reid, 966 F.3d 79, 93 (2d Cir. 2020) (holding that "accusations of concrete, wrongful conduct are actionable[,] while general statements charging a person with being racist, unfair, or unjust are not" (quotation simplified)); Law Offices of David Freydin, PC v. [read post]
