Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 21 - 40 of 48,953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2014, 4:55 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Via Ashkan Soltani: ”The Yale Law Journal Online (YLJO) just published an article that Ashkan Soltani co-authored with Kevin Bankston (first workshopped at the Privacy Law Scholars Conference last year) entitled Tiny Constables and the Cost of Surveillance: Making Cents Out of United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:24 pm by Simon Gibbs
The Court of Appeal handed down judgment on 12 October 2011 in Motto & Others v Trafigura [2011] EWCA Civ 1150 ruling that funding costs are not recoverable. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 11:26 pm by Simon Gibbs
The decision of Mr Justice Walker in Page v RGC Restaurants Ltd [2018] EWHC 2688 (QB) provides further important guidance on the costs budgeting process and is essential reading for those involved in costs budgeting. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:23 pm
The importance of Westwood v Knight [2011] EWPCC 11 (11 May 2011) is that it was the first trial under the new rules for the Patents County Court and thus the first opportunity for the court to consider the cost capping rules in the context of an entire case. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 10:56 pm by Simon Gibbs
The recent costs management case of CIP Properties (AIPT) Ltd v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd & Ors (Costs No. 2) [2015] EWHC 481 (TCC) has been widely reported as an example of the court “slashing” the claimant’s excessive costs budget. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm by Simon Gibbs
A regular reader of the Legal Costs Blog recently got in touch to ask whether the decision in National Westminster Bank v Kotonou [2009] EWHC 3309 (Ch) was a useful one when challenging the costs associated with the funding of a claim. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:39 pm by Simon Gibbs
” Burton J said, in Nugent v Goss Aviation [2002] EWHC 1281 (QB): “On an assessment the costs judge, who will prima facie disallow costs in respect of issues abandoned or not pursued, as the Court of Appeal has directed to do in Shirley v Caswell, will in any event disallow the costs of any claims which were positively struck out. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 10:30 pm by Simon Gibbs
The decision by Regional Costs Judge Lumb in Merrix v Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust [2016] EWHC B28 (QB) caused many to question the point of costs budgeting. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:27 am by brooks
Earlier this month, the American Automobile Association  (AAA) released a study, Crashes v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 10:15 pm by Simon Gibbs
As far back as 2005, Lord Justice Brooke observed in Black v Pastouna & Anor [2005] EWCA Civ 1389 that: “It is incumbent on those advising parties appearing before this, or any, court to take all the steps they can in accordance with CPR Rules 1.1 and 1.3 to reduce the cost of the proceedings. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:58 pm by Simon Gibbs
There are some odd comments in the judgment in Lifestyle Equities CV & Anor v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Limited & Ors [2023] EWHC 2923 (Ch) : “The Defendants … say the Claimants accepted the Defendants’ incurred costs were reasonable in the Precedent R. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 2:39 pm
Last July, Madam Justice Ballance provided her decision on the issue of court costs in Mawdsley v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:15 pm by Simon Gibbs
A recent comment on a LinkedIn discussion forum raised the issue of whether the proposed changes to the Part 36 rules and the formal reversal of Carver v BAA were sensible. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:33 pm by Simon Gibbs
The Costs Law Articles Archive section of Legal Costs Central has been updated with a couple of articles from 2006 dealing with failure to meditate and the Myatt v National Coal Board and Garrett v Halton Borough Council judgments. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:08 pm by Simon Gibbs
Apparently His Honour Judge Charles Harris QC, in the case of Bridle v Ikhlas on 22nd February 2011 reached a similar conclusion to HHJ Stewart. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 6:45 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation     [1] Colistro v Thunder Bay [2] Merrifield v RCMP The post Costs Issues in Litigation appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 6:45 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation     [1] Colistro v Thunder Bay [2] Merrifield v RCMP The post Costs Issues in Litigation appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:55 pm by Simon Gibbs
The amount of the claim for costs in the case of Motto & Ors v Trafigura Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 90201 (Costs) (15 February 2011) - £104,707,772.72 – was truly eye-watering. [read post]