Search for: "County of San Bernardino v. City of San Bernardino"
Results 21 - 40
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2021, 9:51 am
Authorities in Santa Clara County, CA, San Bernardino County, CA, and Fort Worth, TX all reported that drug crimes were among the most common reasons for cell phone data extractions. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm
Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 5:24 pm
County of San Bernardino (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 677 (my July 14, 2016 post on which can be found here), on the ground that it dealt with urban decay (a technical subject requiring expert opinion), rather than aesthetics (a nontechnical subject within the purview of lay opinion). [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
County of San Diego (September 28, 2018, case no. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Inѕtеаd, іt еnѕurеѕ thаt the tax authority gеtѕ fіrѕt tо сlаіm over оthеr creditors vуіng fоr thе іndіvіduаl’ѕ or buѕіnеѕѕ’ рrореrtу. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:47 pm
The municipal bankruptcies in two California cities — Stockton and San Bernardino — also support the court’s observation that unsustainable collective-bargaining agreements have contributed to other municipal bankruptcies. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 144, 151; Sierra Club v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:41 pm
County of San Bernardino (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 677, 685.) [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
County of San Bernardino, the Fourth District Court of Appeal addressed whether paid administrative leave could constitute an adverse employment action. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 1:12 pm
County of San Bernardino, a public entity; City of Highland, a public entity; et al., San Bernardino Superior Court, case no. 1309504, shows that accepted practices are not necessarily safe. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:22 pm
County of San Bernardino (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 677, 685, and apparently by the parties – the DEIR concluded urban decay was not a reasonably foreseeable consequence of retiring the courthouse because the City and County were highly incentivized and committed to finding a new economic use for it, and there were numerous downtown businesses and land uses independent of its operations. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
County of San Bernardino (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 677, 684-685.) [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
San Bernardino Co. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
County of San Bernardino (2015) 62 Cal.4th 168, 182.) [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
County of San Bernardino (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 352. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 11:14 am
A manual recount must be conducted under the supervision of the election official by recount boards, (each consisting of four San Bernardino County voters), appointed by the election official. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:49 pm
County of San Bernardino (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 677, the challenged project was a 9,100 square foot Dollar Store with parking lot and landscaping improvements, rejecting plaintiff’s urban decay arguments. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
County of San Bernardino (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 352. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:50 pm
County of San Bernardino (Dynamic Development, LLC, Real Party in Interest) (4th Dist., Div. 2, 2016) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2016 WL _____, Case No. [read post]
