Search for: "Cox v. Amend"
Results 21 - 40
of 561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
In Earl of the Family Cox v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:18 pm
Holding that even bloggers -- not just the institutional press -- are protected by the First Amendment holding in Gertz, and that as a result, a plaintiff who sues 'em for defamation for posts that involve a public concern needs to demonstrate actual (not merely presumed) damages as well as negligence on the part of the blogger.Law blogger Eugene Volokh (The Volokh Conspiracy) represented the defendant on appeal, and law blogger Tom Goldstein (SCOTUSblog) filed an amicus brief. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:08 pm
Currently, the case of Perry v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Many of those signing on were on the professors' brief filed in Matrixx v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 11:39 am
Cox (D. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:34 am
Cox (9th Cir. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 7:23 am
City of Stanton v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 7:23 am
City of Stanton v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 7:56 am
Cox, an 11-page, 5-0 opinion, Justice Boehm writes:We hold that the 2003 amendment to Indiana Trial Rule 4.4(A) eliminated the need for a two-step process to evaluate personal jurisdiction over a party. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:11 am
Padrick v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm
Cox, 18 Misc 3d 1142 [A] (Sup. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 8:06 am
Article V does not expressly define the composition of an amendments convention. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:53 am
Our previous Trump v Twitter piece explained how s.230 gives both a shield and a sword to online providers like Twitter and Facebook, providing not only (1) that no provider shall be treated as the publisher of information provided by another (thereby protecting providers, as supposed mere platforms, from legal proceedings regarding what has been said by users on those platforms), but also (2) that where a provider does, in good faith, moderate what is published by American users,… [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 9:14 pm
Cox v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:07 am
The issue in Cox v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
Tingdene Holiday Parks Ltd v Cox and others [2011] UKUT 310 (LC)By s.21B, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, a demand for the payment of service charges must be “accompanied” by a summary of rights and obligations of tenants in relation to the same. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
Tingdene Holiday Parks Ltd v Cox and others [2011] UKUT 310 (LC)By s.21B, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, a demand for the payment of service charges must be “accompanied” by a summary of rights and obligations of tenants in relation to the same. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 10:59 am
Janine Cox won in Wahl v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 1:05 am
The US Court of Appeals took on this question earlier this month.The case of BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v Cox Communications dealt with Cox who are an internet service provider for roughly 4.5 million users. [read post]
