Search for: "Cox v. Long"
Results 21 - 40
of 432
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Mesa v. [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
Madigan v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
Cox, 342 F. 2d 167, 171 (CA5 1965). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm
Cox, 342 F. 2d 167, 171 (CA5 1965). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:39 pm
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Similarly, in Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 2:32 pm
Superior Hosp., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 7:07 am
v=VaSTb5kNT4s 7. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Brian Cox 24. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Read the article, which argues that reform is long overdue, here. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
(The Chancery opinion weighed in at 194-pages long, and the Supreme Court’s opinion, including the concurrence, in total was just under 100-pages long.) [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify associations between hair product use and uterine cancer using Cox proportional hazard models. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:53 am
Section 541(f) should be a wake-up call for all the players—governmental and otherwise—to put on their long-range thinking caps. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
However, the plan can be “simple and need not necessarily be in place for a long period of time”. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 3:03 am
Cox Jr. ruled in favor of a filing by the Democratic Party and U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
” Fredrick v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
On Oct. 5, the Fifth Circuit held in Texas v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Gallo v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:35 pm
Amanda Rice argues remotely in Lange v. [read post]
