Search for: "Cox v. Pennsylvania R. Co." Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Paul Mollica calls this a genuine head-scratcher] Cox v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
In inspections, the EPA said it found violations by Fafard, FRE Building Co. and Benchmark Engineering Corp. at sites in Holliston, Natick, Uxbridge, Milford, Marlborough and elsewhere. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Cox Professor of Law, The George Washington University --Robert Cover, Legal Pluralism, and the Possibility of a Jurisgenerative Jurisprudence Avi Soifer. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]