Search for: "Cox v. State of Wisconsin" Results 21 - 37 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2013, 9:36 am by Tracy Coenen
Crystal Cox, extortionist and vexatious litigant, has been slapped down by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:46 pm by Edward A. Fallone
On December 1, the Wisconsin Department of Administration released new rules governing access to state facilities, including the State Capitol, for protests, rallies, demonstrations and any other “gathering of four or more people for the purpose of actively promoting any cause. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-6602; Cox v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:59 am by Gabe Acevedo
Ironically, as an aside, look what was found yesterday outside the Wisconsin Capitol.That said, Cox may have a decent shot at winning a suit against the state of Indiana. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:46 am by Brad Wendel
  He became involved in an exchange on Twitter with a MoJo staffer who had Tweeted that police might remove demonstraters from the Wisconsin state capitol building. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am by Adam Chandler
 The Wisconsin State Journal has the report, which David Post discusses at the Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:20 pm by Florida Coastal School of Law
Supreme Court to re-open the 1929 case Wisconsin v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:34 am
The Court rejected DNR’s argument that it was not the proximate cause of harm to Lynx, relying on caselaw including Strahan v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
See International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. [read post]