Search for: "Craighead v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
Lord Hope of Craighead, in turn, granted a highly unusual interview to The Times rejecting these criticisms (‘Salmond has got it all wrong, says judge – First Minister “misunderstood the law and the facts”’, 27 May 2011). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:03 pm
As he said in the first paragraph of his opinion,It is the policy of the State of Ohio that the State follows its written execution protocol, except when it does not. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:54 am
The Supreme Court The appeal has been heard by Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lady Hale of Richmond, Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore and Sir Nicholas Wilson. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
They stated (in Fraser (Nat Gordon) v HM Advocate (No. 2) [2009] HCJAC 27 at paragraph 13 that: “[W]e have come to the conclusion that the appellant’s application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council should be refused as incompetent. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
” The judges of the Court of Session have said this “In McDonald v HM Advocate Lord Hope of Craighead held that a decision by the High Court of Justiciary not to entertain and determine a devolution issue that had been intimated to it could be treated as a “determination” of the issue for the purposes of paragraph 13 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998; this might be thought a somewhat Jesuitical position. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:03 am
Craighead, 539 F.3d 1079, 1080 (9th Cir. 2008); United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Craighead v Homes for Islington & LB Islington [2010] UKUT 47 (LC) is a decision of Andrew Trott in the Upper Tribunal on an appeal from the LVT. 21 leaseholders faced bills of £30-40,000 for service charges between 2006 and 2008 relating to "external repairs & decoration, window/roof renewal". [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Craighead v Homes for Islington & LB Islington [2010] UKUT 47 (LC) is a decision of Andrew Trott in the Upper Tribunal on an appeal from the LVT. 21 leaseholders faced bills of £30-40,000 for service charges between 2006 and 2008 relating to "external repairs & decoration, window/roof renewal". [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
The Secretary of State’s submissions were clear as to the result. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
Feelings of the kind that the aliens' beliefs and conduct give rise to must be resisted for however long it takes to ensure that they have this protection.-- James Arthur David Hope (above right), the member of the British House of Lords who goes by the nom de juge of Lord Hope of Craighead, writing last Wednesday in RB (Algeria) (FC) v Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't.In the end, the Law Lords ruled in favor of the British government in this "case… [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
Feelings of the kind that the aliens' beliefs and conduct give rise to must be resisted for however long it takes to ensure that they have this protection.-- James Arthur David Hope (above right), the member of the British House of Lords who goes by the nom de juge of Lord Hope of Craighead, writing last Wednesday in RB (Algeria) (FC) v Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't.In the end, the Law Lords ruled in favor of the British government in this "case… [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
R (RJM) (FC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63 This House of Lords judgment is now just under two weeks old, but I think it is still worthy of comment here. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 7:30 am
Both Mike at C&F and Eugene at VC have posted about Judge Bybee's 9th Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:50 am
Craighead, No. 07-10135 (8-21-08). [read post]
