Search for: "Creative Management Services, LLC v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:47 am by Eric Goldman
” Plus, “The allegedly infringing images was stored on Valuewalk’s server in the United States, was accessible from computers within the United States, and its use was directed towards United States readers. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Given the SEC’s expertise, wherewithal, creativity and specialized resources to prosecute any kind of securities fraud, the SEC, not surprisingly, led the charge. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:32 pm by Nikki Siesel
Creative Harbor, LLC (“Creative Harbor”) filed its intent-to-use application on February 19, 2014. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
The court found that the piece in question, a review of anti-counterfeit regulations, “possesses a creative quality, epitomised by originality and novelty” because the work was "“the result of a personal, original, new and creative elaboration of legal concepts and industry practices and of the experiences of the author”. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
Specifically, the webinar involved a discussion of non-compete and trade secret issues in Europe and China as compared to the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV… [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
 ”Because the University of Alabama is a state entity, it cannot be joined in a case in federal court. [read post]