Search for: "Cross v. The State of Texas et al" Results 21 - 40 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2017, 5:35 pm by Steven Cohen
Facts:  This case (Alfonso Cioffi, et al., v Google, Inc – United States District Court Eastern District of Texas – January 9th, 2017) involves a patent infringement claim related to the Google Chrome web browser. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 11:13 am
Foley answered the complaint for BCBS by stating that BCBS’s real name is Health Care Service Corporation (HCSC), a mutual legal reserve company doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas. [read post]
Oct. 30, 2009) (per curiam) (restricted appeal of default judgment, error on the face of the record, time of service not noted on return of citation)INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA v. [read post]
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txsd-3_19-cv-00238/pdf/USCOURTS-txsd-3_19-cv-00238-2.pdf [1] Jana Reed, et al., v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Dalton Cross Professor, University of Texas School of LawReenactmentFor appellants James Carter, et al., Erin E. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:05 pm
Koninklijke Phillips et al (CAFC 2009-1208, 1209) precedential This is a basic contract dispute, governed by state law. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm by Alison Rowe
CV-07-1322 in the 415th District Court of Parker County, Texas; Lynn Welk, et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
(cross-petition asks for recourse on failure to dance) Antitrust Reverse Payments: GlaxoSmithKline, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:33 am
Amanda Blackhorse et al., Case No.1:14-cv-01043-GBL-IDD (July 8, 2015).On cross-motions for summary judgment, the court ruled that the disparagement provision of Section 2(a) does not violate the First Amendment because Section 2(a) "does not implicate the First Amendment" and because "the federal trademark registration program is government speech and is therefore exempt from First Amendment scrutiny. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Carey, et al. 09-89 Conditional cross-petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Cross-petitioner’s reply Docket: 08-1515 Title: Golden Gate Restaurant Association v. [read post]