Search for: "D*branch v. Harris"
Results 21 - 40
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Table 1: Selected County and Municipal Rental Car Excise Taxes State Locality Car Rental Excise Tax Funding Purpose Alaska Anchorage 8% City general fund Arizona Maricopa County (Phoenix) The greater of 3.25% or $2.50 per rental Glendale Stadium; youth & amateur sports Arizona Pima County (Tucson) $3.50 Kino Sports Complex Colorado Denver 7.25% Colorado Convention Center Georgia Atlanta 10% State Farm Arena Illinois Chicago 6% and 9% transaction tax (a) City general fund Indiana Marion… [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:01 am
There is established in the legislative branch the National Commission on the Siege and Occupation of the U.S. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Defendants argued that a similar approach could apply here, because the Legislature allowed the judicial branch to develop the application of inverse condemnation actions to various statutes and rules. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am
Kamala Harris has represented California in the Senate since 2017. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Defendants argued that a similar approach could apply here, because the Legislature allowed the judicial branch to develop the application of inverse condemnation actions to various statutes and rules. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:35 pm
Kamala Harris (D-CA) about the “real-world consequences” of judicial decisions, Barrett said she always considers the consequences on people’s lives before ruling in a case. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:23 am
It would be triggered by the inadequacies of the Presidential Succession Act passed in 1947 (when there was no vice president, because Harry Truman had succeeded Franklin D. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Defendants argued that a similar approach could apply here, because the Legislature allowed the judicial branch to develop the application of inverse condemnation actions to various statutes and rules. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
Davis, and NLRB v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
From Ganske v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
President Harry Truman believed that legislative leaders who enjoyed an electoral mandate, rather than Cabinet officers who did not, should be first in presidential succession. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:30 am
State Farm Lloyds (No. 19-0802) Thursday Jan 9 Tommy Yowell, Gail Yowell, Harry Graff, El Terico, LLC and Casuarina Investments, LLC (d/b/a Lar Resources, LLC) v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
In Flowers v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:54 pm
Bloom, 2013 BCSC 1180 at para. 62; Harris v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris Funeral Homes is a transgender case from the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
