Search for: "D D v. State of Indiana" Results 21 - 40 of 1,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2011, 10:09 am by Marcia Oddi
State of Indiana , an 11-page opinion, Judge Darden writes:Amanda... [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 1:59 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The case has since been transferred to the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. d/b/a Maxi-Cosi of Columbus, Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Patent No. 6,467,840 (“the ‘840 Patent”) for a “Child’s Car Seat Insert”. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:02 am
Tinder in Indianapolis, who'd struck down part of the state's 2006 law banning out-of-state shipments to Indiana customers without that initial in-person contact. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:52 am by Marcia Oddi
State of Indiana, a 10-page, 5-0 opinion in a direct appeal, the first opinion we've... [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 11:33 am by Marcia Oddi
State of Indiana (ILB summary here - 3rd case) is the subject... [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:20 am by Marcia Oddi
State of Indiana , a 10-page opinion, Judge Darden writes:1.... [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:25 am by Marcia Oddi
State of Indiana , a 4-page opinion where appellant-petitioner appeals... [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:57 am by Marcia Oddi
State of Indiana, a 13-page, 5-0 opinion, Justice Rucker writes:In this opinion we discuss among... [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
(“Inspire”) of Boulder County, Colorado, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, enVista, LLC, enVista Interactive Solutions, LLC d/b/a Enspire Commerce, and RetailPoint II, LLC d/b/a RetailPoint, all of  Carmel, Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Trademark Registration Number 4,344,942. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 8:58 am
From the Indiana Lawyer, an article on the recent Indiana Supreme Court decision:The state's eminent domain statute allows Indiana municipalities to acquire operations of privately owned water and sewer utilities that serve recently annexed portions of that community, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled today.The split 3-2 decision came in Utility Center, Inc., d/b/a Aquasource v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 10:24 am
The Attorney General seems to have problems with its civil investigative demand (CID) but I am relying on the Indiana Lawyer on this one:The Indiana Attorney General must provide at least a verified petition to a court to enforce a civil investigative demand and show the demand is proper, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled today.In Nu-Sash of Indianapolis, Inc. d/b/a McKee Sunroom Designs v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 11:23 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Pettigrew, and Deann Hensley all of Beech Grove, Indiana infringed its rights in many United States Copyright Registrations of musical compositions as stated below. [read post]