Search for: "D. BRINKER"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2013, 4:29 pm
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
The district court should consider the impact of the California Supreme Court's decision in Brinker v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:45 am
Rylaarsdam, Associate Justice Richard D. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm
The Court also noted that Brinker impacted the analysis of meal period claims and required evaluation by the District Court. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm
§1056[d][3][B][ii][I]; CPLR 5205[c][4].) [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
In Section II-D on damages, however, the Ninth Circuit announces a new holding that clarifies Dukes significantly. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:59 pm
The Court also noted that Brinker impacted the analysis of meal period claims and required evaluation by the District Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:44 am
Brinker Int’l, Inc., 441 F. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
On remand after Brinker, the Court of Appeal reaffirmed its earlier decision. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:49 am
Cocktails & or d'oeuvres 5:30 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 11:40 am
The parties’ supplemental briefing presented starkly different interpretations of Brinker’s implications as to predominance, with Judge Fitzgerald finding that, while “the Brinker court did not elaborate on every possible form of common proof that may satisfy a predominance assessment,” the plaintiff in Paige sufficiently “allege[d] the existence of various uniform policies that were consistently applied to purported class members,” and… [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:56 am
On May 25, 2012, Central District Judge Dean D. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:49 pm
(followed by cocktails and hors d'ouevres from 5:00-6:00) at Le Meridien (Galleria) in Dallas. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 12:49 pm
In Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
But when you certify an overtime exemption misclassification case, try it, and win a $15 million verdict, you'd think that the hard times are behind you. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 8:29 am
Brinker may donate her entire salary to charity. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:42 pm
No word yet on whether the argument will be broadcast over the internet, as Brinker was. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm
In a letter protesting the move, Democrats Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Diana DeGette (D-CO) called the inquiry a politically-motivated waste of time and taxpayer money, stating: “Planned Parenthood is being singled out as part of a Republican vendetta against an organization that provides family planning and other medical care to low-income women and men. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Meanwhile, on December 16, 2011, Brinker applied for leave to file a supplemental brief pursuant to Rule of Court 8.520(d) to bring a federal district judge's order to the Court's attention. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:09 am
I'd love to hear what you think about this issue? [read post]
