Search for: "D. Burrell"
Results 21 - 40
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2018, 11:33 am
• Burrell D. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm
Summer is almost over, but before I put away my flip flops and seer sucker suit here’s a last look at what has been a very busy summer in the field of ADA and FHA litigation. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
You have to compare the speech of the P and the speech of the D. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
Diversion through competition is legit, but not what D did. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:01 am
Burrell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 1:06 pm
District Court Judge Susan D. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:18 am
Per the so-called “Burrell test,” based on the 1991 decision in Burrell v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Bringing machinery of TM law into place may be a bad idea if a year from now there won’t be as much secondary meaning in the US.Robert Burrell: Reputation standard in Europe differs from well-known in New Zealand differs from famous in the US. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Robert Burrell: The market should often correct itself in terms of mark choice. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:23 am
Stacy D. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:16 am
Always construed broadly—factfinder should identify what most fairly may be said to embody the D’s appropriation of the P’s design. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
If that’s right, it’s not obvious why we’d prioritize patent logic over TM logic. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Robert Burrell: Difficulties we have with nonuse. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Word marks can also be functional; not useful to deal with this by asking whether a symbol is functional for P or D. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
Although it is more than 10 years since the Metropolitan Police began “Operation Caryatid” [pdf] and 5 years since the commencement of Operation Weeting phone hacking is still in the news. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm
Last week saw a trial which brought together two names very well known to media lawyers in the past, Burrell v Clifford. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 4:12 am
If this is an area you work in, then I’d urge you to respond. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:32 pm
Where I thought we’d be | PETA litigates over macaque selfie | JIPLIP eventNever too late 64 [week ending on Sunday 20 September] – Adwords in Canada | EU Draft consultation on ISPs | "The UPC: A Panel Debate" | Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music | CJEU in KitKat | Paul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch) | Economics of Collecting Societies |… [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Where I thought we’d be | PETA litigates over macaque selfie | JIPLIP eventNever too late 64 [week ending on Sunday 20 September] – Adwords in Canada | EU Draft consultation on ISPs | "The UPC: A Panel Debate" | Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music | CJEU in KitKat | Paul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch) | Economics of Collecting Societies |… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
Where I thought we’d be | PETA litigates over macaque selfie | JIPLIP eventNever too late 64 [week ending on Sunday 20 September] – Adwords in Canada | EU Draft consultation on ISPs | "The UPC: A Panel Debate" | Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music | CJEU in KitKat | Paul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch) | Economics of Collecting Societies |… [read post]
